DECORATED VIET NAM VETERAN, DILIGENT SCHOLAR, DISTINGUISHED ATTORNEY, WRONGLY ACCUSED, PROSECUTED, CONVICTED, SENTENCED AND IMPRISONED, DENIED PARDON, DENIED COMMUTATION BECAUSE HE IS INNOCENT.
WELCOME TO THE PGHN WEBSITE AND BLOG--dedicated to providing news and analysis of federal and States criminal law, and prison conditions, including their impacts on recidivism, the family, and government. PGHN has been created to provide useful services and information to a Community of caring, sharing persons, including the accused, their attorneys, their families, (or, in the case of entities, their officers, directors, shareholders, partners, trustees, employees—pejoratively "white collar criminals") prosecutors, legislators, college and graduate school professors and students, whose interests are education, forensics, law, political science, psychology, psychiatry, sociology, related disciplines, other interested intellectuals and professionals, and the general public, who are as impacted by crime, criminal law, and imprisonment, as all of the usual subjects, even though they may not realize it until too late, except, hopefully, as they gain awareness through our Community.--
to plead guilty?--Donâ€™t do it, David! Yours is yet another of those many bogus
federal cases! The feds were afraid to
indict you under 18 USC 793, for a felony that could garner 10 years, even though they must have asserted it,
ostensibly, to scare you into your ill-conceived guilty plea
to 18 USC 1024, a misguided misdemeanor, because if your daily schedules and
personal notes constituted â€śclassified informationâ€ť your scheming prosecutors--Melendres, Westmoreland Rose [Thanks
God, no relation to Westy, my Viet Nam Commander] ,
Scott [hopefully, no relation to General Winfield]--would
have had to give them up to the grand jurors, who would not have security
clearances, in order for them to make their judgment that a â€śfederal crimeâ€ť had
been committed. That would also have
given the grand jurors the opportunity to know that there was nothing in those
documents that would constitute â€śclassified information,â€ť or, if there was,
that MWRS and the FIB agents were the
violators of 18 USC 793, and 18 USC 1924 in acquiring the â€śclassified
informationâ€ť and passing it on to the jurors!
Likely, that is why the MWRS settled for the misdemeanor and the
Information, which does not require a grand jury. Another
unassailable factor in your favor is that the person to whom you lent your daily
Afghan schedules and personal notes so
she could write your biographyâ€”All In: The Education of David Petraeus--was Paula Broadwell, a military intelligence
officer who had the security clearance necessary
to review the documents, and, like you, a West Point graduate. Like you, she was regarded an expert on
counter-terrorism. She had been deputy
director of the Jebsen Center for Counter-Terrorism Studies at The Fletcher
School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. President Obama has said "I have no
evidence at this point, from what I've seen, that classified information was
disclosed that in any way would have had a negative impact on national
security.â€ť There appears to have been no
harm, no foul, except by the prosecutors, who might now try to grab the All In sales proceeds under statutory
forfeiture provisions. Most
importantly, no crime was committed, except, perhaps, by MWRS and the FIBbers
who grabbed the â€śclassified informationâ€ť when they invaded Broadwellâ€™s home,
unless, of course, like you and your biographer, they had the requisite
security clearances! Congress should
look into this and insist upon appropriate
sanctions if MWRS and the FIBbers did not have the appropriate clearances to
handle â€śclassified information.â€ť As for your
case, General, you should withdraw your plea,
which you should never have entertained in the first place. I would like to say â€śThatâ€™s an Order,â€ť but after all, you are first among us Fighters! Whether you withdraw it or not, it is a plea
to conduct which does not constitute a federal crime. For that reason, federal District Judge
Robert J. Conrad, Jr., before whom the case is pending, should dismiss the case
with prejudice forthwith. If he does not
he would be complicit in the judicial fraud that the prosecutors who should be
punished have perpetrated! At the least,
the MWRS are a shoe-in as virtual additions to the Marking Time Wall of Sham! And just
now the same primrose path is being paved for Hillary Clinton based on her open emails
containing â€śclassified informationâ€ť sent hither and yon rather than simply to another
with proper clearance to receive it, unlike The General!
BOOKS AND MAGAZINES CAN BE SENT INTO PRISONS ONLY FROM PUBLISHERS OR BOOKSELLERS
CLICK ON IMAGES BELOW FOR IMMEDIATE PURCHASE ACCESS AND AUTHORIZED PRISON DELIVERY
The Resurrection Project--THERE ARE NOW POTENTIALLY AVAILABLE 3 “GET OUT OF PRISON LEGALLY” INITIATIVES—LEARN WHICH MAY BE BEST FOR YOUR IMPRISONED FAMILY MEMBER, LOVED ONE, CLIENT. Submit this questionnaire to find out. It’s free
as possible, i.e. Possession of 5 kgs of cocaine):
What was your sentence?
______ years supervised release; fine: $_____;
restitution: $_______; other: _______________.
Your current incarceration started (day/mo/yr):
What conduct might cause you to be
characterized as violent (if none, so state)?
What conduct might cause you to be
characterized as a threat to public safety
if released (if none, so state)?
What ties are you alleged to have to any
criminal organization (if none, so state)?
What prior convictions have you had
(if none, so state)?
Describe any incidents of violence prior
to or during your current term of imprisonment:
What evidence can be presented to demonstrate
your prison conduct and how would such conduct
be characterized by the BOP?
What is the status of any appeal?
What is the status of any other proceedings?
HEADLINE NEWS--Protesting across the Nation against the Ferguson Grand Jury’s Decision not to indict Whitie Wilson, Arms Ups (mostly Whites) added chokehold victim’s “I can’t breathe” to their repertoire following a New York Grand Jury’s Decision not to indict Whitie Pantaleo, both Whities having acted in the line of duty as police officers; Wilson to prevent his gun being taken in Robber Brown’s assault; Pantaleo while enforcing arrest against cigarette tax scuff law Garner, whose constant hawking before their taxed and licenced shops caused the owners’ snitching. Given the failure to purpose of the Missouri Prosecutor, the New York Prosecutor did not attempt to demonstrate the bona fides of his Grand Jury’s decision with like disclosures of extensive documentation and deliberation. Garner’s wife has been commended for publicly stating that his “unjustified murder” was not “a black and white thing,” but rather his constant misbehavior under the State cigarette tax stamp law. Doubtless, no one believes that death is an appropriate punishment for such a violation, constant or not, and only the racially biased would believe that Pantaleo could have intended to impose any such punishment upon Garner’s arrest, but cigarette tax stamp laws are taken very seriously, even by the Fed, for which read the exciting tale of Rolemand Smokzem, who has his own chapter in Marking Time, pp.334-363, with dire consequences, real and potential. An actual example of such irrational racial bias was demonstrated by Ismaaiyl Brinsley’s killing of two police officers and his arithmetically incorrect instagram immediately prior: "I'm putting wings on pigs today. They take 1 of ours, let's take 2 of theirs, #Shootthepolice RIPErivGardner (sic) RIPMikeBrown.” Heartening to see Sharpton and other Community Activists condemning this misguided response. Too bad that they are unwilling to do the same for those who protest the decisions of juries of their peers as to Zimmerman, Wilson, and Pantaleo.
VOTE WHETHER THE CRITICISM IS justified OR not CHECK WHICH.